To begin with, the writer wants to make it clear that he is not happy about India’s exit in the semifinal.
However, facts be told and decisions taken on the field be analysed. Both India and NZ made the semis. But there is a lot of difference in the manner in which they both played. Every time India won, they had just scraped through. It was more about one man, a genius in Virat Kohli and bowling spells from Ashish Nehra and R. Ashwin.
1. India’s ODI strategy in T20s: Consolidate in the middle, instead of accelerate
This ain’t 50-over cricket. Scoring at 6.50-7.00 runs per over during the 11th - 35th over of an ODI game will definitely put the opposition under pressure. But such a phase from 7th to 15th in a T20 game is bound to bring the opposition back into contention. And Indian openers haven't set the stage on fire for the middle-order to go about consolidating. Though India haven’t lost much wickets, thanks to Virat Kohli, they have scored 62 runs on an average in the eight overs in the middle.
Classic example was the semifinal. India knew they had to post a huge total and they had the ammunition - at least on paper - to put the game beyond the reach of the Windies. One should have realised that you need a score in excess of 220 after watching Afghanistan smash 170 odd against the SA pace battery. 192/2 sounds great; But given the conditions and the six-hitting prowess of the West Indian unit, a 220/6 would have been ideal.
What’s the point in stating Hardik Pandya has been given the license to thrill when he doesn’t get an opportunity. Though it seemed as if Pandya was sent up ahead of Dhoni against Bangladesh, he was in fact pushed a slot below as an out-of-form Suresh Raina struggled.
2. Was there a designated dasher?
A dasher is as important as a finisher in T20s. Who is India’s Martin Guptill, who is going to whack the ball out of the ground as soon the umpire says ‘Play’? From the way Shikhar Dhawan and Rohit Sharma went about their business, one felt their plan was to construct a 35-ball 45 instead of a 20-ball 45.
Who is India’s Glenn Maxwell kind-of-player? You had Yuvraj Singh, Raina, Hardik Pandya and M.S. Dhoni. Every time Yuvraj walked in he had to play a second fiddle to Kohli. Every time Raina walked in he was under pressure to secure his place and match after match he failed.
Pandya, fearless with no scars of the past, was the only option. But he had little opportunity to unleash with the bat. Kohli was the lone guy striking the fours, sixes, running the twos and singles. Such was the focus on who’s going to finish games, India lacked a ruthless dasher in the middle to wrestle back the momentum which Robin Uthappa and Yuvraj SIngh did so successfully in the 2007 World Cup.
Dhoni, obviously, the finisher. Isn’t he?
3. What was Jaddu’s role?
A left-hander who can clear the ground and bowl sliding ones. What’s the point in saying ‘our batting line-up goes all the way down’ when you don’t tap every resource at your disposal. Except for a couple of fours against Bangladesh, Jaddu’s talent with the bat was hardly utilised. A catch under pressure, a few good frugal overs against Australia and the Windies took him for a ride in the crunch clash. Nothing much.
4. When MSD banked on luck and not Ashwin
Handing Bumrah the penultimate over hoping he would give Hardik Pandya, the only option left on the day, more in the bank was a masterstroke from MSD. And coupled with the mad batting of Bangladesh, India won by a run.
Needing 8 runs to win in the final over against the Windies, MSD opted for Kohli, who claimed a lucky wicket in his first ball earlier during the chase, with his premier spinner R. Ashwin having two overs left.
Why Kohli? Probably, two right handers, powerful hitters at the crease and maybe they could have sealed it in two balls had Ashwin bowled.
West Indies had only two left-handers in Gayle and Benn. The world kept saying Ashwin vs Gayle. But Dhoni never used Ashwin against Gayle in the first over itself. Maybe, MS wanted to reserve Ashwin if Gayle had hit the fifth gear in the first two overs, which never happened.
Gayle gone. Pandya bowls four overs for 43 runs without claiming a wicket, Jadeja sends down four overs for 48 runs without a wicket. And Ashwin was fielding at covers taking a catch off a no-ball from Pandya.
Maybe the probability of a left-arm spinner dismissing a right-handed batsman was high. But, if that’s the case, why pick Ashwin in the first instance, when you had another left-arm spinner Pawan Negi in the dressing room.
If a skipper isn’t going to back his primary weapon, probably the best spinner in the world, during a crunch situation, then why would he have him in the eleven?
It was probably the last thing a top-class spinner would have dreamt of.
And the moment MSD decided to bring on Kohli - just because he has been India’s hero - one felt Captain Cool wasn’t believing his boys’ potential but only luck.